8

There is a certain GIS related book that I'm thinking of purchasing. Unfortunately, there are no comments or reviews on sites such as Amazon of that particular book.

Are questions asking "what do you think of this GIS related book" acceptable on GIS.SE?

5

A question like "is XXX book a good introduction to YYYY?" might be better worded but I'd be happy to see this sort of question (as a community wiki).

  • 1
    CW is not a cure-all for bad questions. "If a question is valuable enough that you believe it belongs on the site, chances are you don’t need it to be community wiki!" See The Future of Community Wiki, August 2011. – whuber Sep 17 '13 at 2:07
  • there clearly (IMHO) isn't a right/wrong answer to this type of question though, isn't that what CW is for? – Ian Turton Sep 17 '13 at 5:24
  • 2
    Sort of--provided the question is a good question to begin with! There's a difference between a question that asks for opinions and one that asks for reasons. The former is out of bounds on SE while the latter is usually welcomed. In rare cases a great question obviously will have multiple good answers: certain lists of things are like that. As Grace Note writes in the blog I referenced, we should demand awesome questions. – whuber Sep 17 '13 at 14:59
6

No, not really: the question asks specifically for opinions, which is explicitly off-topic. That's not something this community can even argue about as long as we remain part of SE.

However, often such questions can be rephrased to probe for useful, objective answers. For instance, if the book is (hypothetically) about learning to use Python for automating ESRI products, you might ask about how this book compares to any others devoted to the same topic and why.

One advantage of taking care to craft an objectively answerable question is that you get better answers and often will be (pleasantly) surprised by the emergence of unexpected answers (like, "yes that book is good for beginners but XXX would serve your needs much better").


One aspect of obtaining objective answers consists of taking some care to stipulate what you mean by potentially subjective characteristics like "good." A book that is "good" for one person could be terrible for another. State what needs the book is intended to satisfy: what level should it be written at? What things should it teach? Otherwise we are left dealing with a question that is not only subjective but also vague.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .