5

This question comes from a discussion in Where to find author/creator of tag?.

I think there is a need of making more explicit the kind of transformation we are referring to in questions tagged as . I created the tag because the tag does not express the same meaning.

'Transformation' is a broad term. helps narrowing down topics and, thus, searches. If tags are to provide users (and search engines) with semantics, I do not see why not expressing different meanings with different tags. I could think of datum transformations, geometry transformations (e.g., scaling, shifting, rotating, and skewing geometries), and PolyGeo mentioned also vertical transformations.

In concrete, to enrich questions about transformations, we could start using (at least) these tags:

  • (which could be a synonym of , because it's arguably the most common meaning intended by the tag ). According to (Iliffe and Lott, 2008), datum transformation is a misnomer and one should use coordinate transformation instead. (Knippers, 2009) uses the term datum transformation to refer to transformations between 3D CRS. In summary, could be a synonym of , both defined as a "Change of coordinates from one CRS to another in which the CRSs are based on different datums." (Iliffe and Lott, 2008, p.177)
  • Change of coordinates from one vertical CRS to another. Vertical CRSs have one coordinate (height) based on a vertical datum, which is usually related to mean sea level. (Iliffe and Lott, 2008, p.180)
  • A transformation between 2-dimensional plane (cartesian) coordinates that can rotate, shift, scale (even applying different factors on each axis) and skew geometries.
  • Is a non-linear transformation that translates, rotates and changes scale in a variable way. At least 6 control points are required to calculate the 12 parameters of a (second-order) polynomial transformation. Could be synonym of .

Perhaps when one of the aforementioned tags appears on a question, most probably the tag shouldn't be there.

How are datum and affine/polynomial transformations different?

Unlike coordinate (datum) transformations, affine/polynomial transformations are local in nature. For coordinate transformations, national mapping agencies promote parameters to the public, whereas for affine/polynomial transformations, the users of the data calculate their own parameters, and those are only valid for that particular case. Moreover, in affine/polynomial transformations, one or two of the underlying CRS may be unknown. It is often the case that a CRS is missing or, due to some errors in the acquisition or processing of the data, a CRS is actually wrong, which makes it impossible to apply a coordinate transformation.

Transformations and conversions

Transformation and conversion are different things in the context of coordinate reference systems. Transformations take place between different datums, conversions take place between the same datum.

Regarding geometries, it seems that geometry conversion is preferred over geometry transformation (which I proposed in an earlier version of this post) in GIS terminology. Therefore, I propose to use like this:

  • A change from a geometry type to another, e.g., points to lines, lines to polygons, polygons to points, and the like.

What do you community think?

References

  • 2
    A projection conversion does not imply a datum transformation. – Germán Carrillo Dec 29 '14 at 15:20
  • 1
    Maybe you could provide an answer (or edit the question), with suggestions of excerpt and wiki for those new proposed tags. It would help to clarify what you have in mind for them. Also, consider addressing how projection-conversions would fit within this proposal. Tks. – Andre Silva Dec 29 '14 at 15:50
  • 1
    I think the difference between projection-conversions and datum-transformation is that conversions are reversible with no accuracy loss. Datum transforms will always lose accuracy; how much depends on the method. – Mintx Dec 29 '14 at 20:58
  • That's true, Mintx. – Germán Carrillo Dec 30 '14 at 4:46
1

If it helps narrowing the discussion, tag was merged into after discussion in Using/synonymizing/merging [coordinate-system] and [projection] tags?.

About I think it is the same case as [transformation], and , merged into because they were frequently used interchangeably.

On the other hand, tags and are very specific and seem to be doing fine.

I believe would cause some confusion (in the same sense as [transformation], [projection-conversions], etc). I think tagging questions like + + is also valid.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .