As a beginner contributor, I have faced many of others' questions closed by a group consisting of similar users (which I'm not gonna say their names) while the questions were so helpful and they had respected the laws of the forum.

For example, they even closed a very specific question by marking it as too broad: https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/310629/animated-surface-runoff-simulation-in-pyqgis

The body of that since deleted question was:

I want to create a plugin for QGIS to simulate surface runoff and visualize that as a time-lapse animation on the Canvas.

I want to know the names of all python libraries which make possible to implement such an idea?

Why do some users close many questions as too broad or unclear?

migrated from gis.stackexchange.com Feb 6 at 15:56

This question came from our site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals.

  • 4
    Without specific questions, we can't speak to why an item was closed/put on hold. The most frequent cause I've seen on this site is request for coding (or fixes to code issues) without including your code attempt in the question. – smiller Feb 6 at 16:10
  • 4
    I try to follow these rules gis.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions but I am sure that I do wrong decisions every now and then. Fortunately it is possible to nominate questions for re-opening. – user30184 Feb 6 at 16:22
  • 2
    @Afshin like this gis.stackexchange.com/questions/310629/… > what did you try/where are you stuck with the code? – Mapperz Feb 6 at 16:27
  • 1
    @Mapperz I have read the ethics of the forum several times, and I did nothing wrong in that question but I got the worst. – Afshin Salehi Feb 6 at 16:48
  • 8
    No, that question was broad. You asked for the names of all python libraries for implementing creating a QGIS plugin for animation of surface runoff. That's a hugely broad question, spanning plugin creation, runoff assessment, and animation within QGIS. You showed no efforts at solving the problem yourself. Each of those would be a broad question in themselves. – Spacedman Feb 6 at 16:55
  • 6
    If you see the same names closing questions, that's not because there's a "mafia", it means there's very few people spending their time for free trying to moderate the site to create a useful resource of GIS questions here. – Spacedman Feb 6 at 17:14
  • 2
    At the end of the day a good question (with a clear answer) will attract more views and the right person to answer. – Mapperz Feb 6 at 18:58
  • 1
    Perhaps review gis.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4291/115. I think GIS SE and its protocols make a lot more sense when it is viewed as a site for focused Q&A. The Stack Exchange network of sites was not designed to be a discussion forum. For discussing less focused ideas the GIS Chat Room is always available. – PolyGeo Feb 6 at 21:16
  • It would be good if this site upheld itself to a standard of "there's no such thing as a bad question." Shooting down people's questions by being too quick to pull the trigger on "off-topic" and "too broad" classifications is pretty inconsiderate when people are genuinely coming here for help. – Zachary Ordo - GISP Apr 11 at 19:45

Without knowing more details and examples about questions you are talking about it is impossible to answer this objectively. Questions might get closed incorrectly, though it is subjective to define 'incorrect'. There are well defined guidelines for closing, but they are subjective to each user's interpretation. So we should always trust community's judgement together with using the system's tools (such as reopening votes and discussions in meta) to correct misjudged calls.

Now, answering more broadly:

Why some users close many questions as too-broad or unclear?

Why some users do not? My opinion is that we could be doing more.

It is important to remember that the main objective of most Stack Exchange sites (including GIS SE) is to build a repository of high quality content regarding on topic subjects in our community. This is important because questions which are not well posed (on-topic, well written, relevant scope) have greater chances of being downvoted; closed as off-topic, unclear, broad or opinion-based; or abandoned by not getting any attention and consequently automatically deleted by the community bot). By doing so, we are already helping users to quickly find good answers to their questions.

If we don't do that (keep a high signal-to-noise; or at least try), it is going to be increasingly difficult to find good stuff here, users will eventually quit contributing, and GIS will resume to other existing forums where we search, search and end up frustrated by not finding (or taking too long to find) useful answers.

Is there a Mafia or something here?

Depends on the POV (a mafia of volunteers trying to curate this site?).

I feel bad when newcomers get their questions closed (my first in SE was), but the system also has plenty of mechanisms to help turning around (one of them is that if the question is edited within a five day window after being 'put on hold', it automatically goes to the reopen queue where it will be re-assessed for reopening; what we can't to do though is to edit 'on hold' questions with irrelevant edits). Additionally, a new tool coming is the question wizard, which I believe will help a lot.

Moreover, every time a question gets closed, there will be plenty of messages explaining what to do next, links and comments from reviewers pointing to our tour page, help center page, posts on Meta, etc.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .