2

I see that we have version-specific tags for Oracle:

Do we need to add a tag for Oracle 18c?

  • 1
    I’m not seeing a strong enough vote on either the question or answer to implement what either appears to propose. – PolyGeo Oct 20 at 2:00
  • @PolyGeo I think your suggestion to consolidate the Oracle tags is correct. Do you feel you need a few dozen people to agree before you move forward? – User1973 Oct 20 at 2:20
  • Usually about a "5 vote" gap will do - especially if its 5-0. My "calculation" on this was 2 for the new tag proposed in your question, and 4 for the synonyms proposed in my answer. I think if you were to accept the answer with my proposal then we would have enough. – PolyGeo Oct 20 at 4:43
  • This has now been implemented. – PolyGeo Nov 1 at 7:50
5

If we are looking at some Oracle tags then I think it may be worth looking at them in context with all our Oracle tags.

If you use [*oracle*] in the search bar it expands to [oracle] or [oracle-spatial] or [oracle-11g] or [oracle-10g] or [oracle-12c] or [cx-oracle] or [oracle-map-builder]

In total there are 627 questions with an Oracle tag on them. The counts on those not already in your question are:

I used to be a strong advocate of version tags but over time I have seen them having less and less value. Nowadays I think the best, and usually the only, place for mentioning software versions is in the question body.

Rather than creating a new Oracle version tag I propose that we move towards an Oracle tagging scheme along these lines:

To get to this we could:

  1. synonymize the Oracle version tags with Oracle Spatial, or go through them to disambiguate and re-tag them as Oracle Spatial or Oracle DBMS
  2. burninate the CX Oracle and Oracle Map Builder tags
  3. once the tag has been emptied out make it a synonym of

I make the above proposal as a rare user of Oracle and hope that our Oracle users will join us in this discussion.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .