Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 15, 2015 at 21:43 comment added PolyGeo Mod OK - I can go along with this now - I just re-checked the QChainage questions and I thought I had seen them spanning four or so years but it looks like they are all since November last year which puts it into the "few hundred questions in next few years" range that makes it tag worthy to me rather than being well outside of it.
Mar 15, 2015 at 20:28 comment added Chris W @PolyGeo Rarely now... but all tags, unless retroactively created and applied, have to start somewhere/with a small number of applications. Past results do not guarantee future performance, as they so often say with investing. What may be granular now could be broader in the future, and I see no reason to intentionally make it harder to find that grain in a bigger sandbox or beach. I'd just fix the Wiki.
Mar 14, 2015 at 10:26 comment added PolyGeo Mod It is mixing concept and tool tags but for the sake of pragmatism I think that is OK for tags that are rarely used.
Mar 14, 2015 at 10:18 comment added underdark Mod I stand by my point that mixing concepts and tool tags seems like a bad idea to me.
Mar 14, 2015 at 10:16 comment added PolyGeo Mod Not bad, but I think overly granular - my preference would be to put matlab-mapping-toolbox as a synonym of matlab (only 51 questions) too.
Mar 14, 2015 at 10:11 comment added underdark Mod Why not? Topics like matlab-mapping-toolbox have a tag too. Just because it's really focused doesn't make it bad imho.
Mar 14, 2015 at 10:02 comment added PolyGeo Mod ... but with only 5 questions tagged qchainage (plus three more untagged that mention it) in over 4.5 years does it really warrant a separate tag?
Mar 14, 2015 at 9:56 history answered underdarkMod CC BY-SA 3.0